A Question About Intelligent Design Philosophy

Intelligent Design is not a science. Science depends upon emperical evidence, and I.D. has very little (read "none").

However, how much more defensible would Intelligent Design be as a philosophy?

Posted on Jun 2, 2008 at 4:39:59 AM EDT.

Help me pay for the weblog

If you found this helpful, a click here will return the favor.

The Marketplace of Ideas

Technorati Tags: , ,

» An Answer about Intelligent Design from I Am, Therefore I Think
In a previous post, I asked the following:how much more defensible would Intelligent Design be as a philosophy [than as science]?Upon further consideration, I have concluded that I.D. is impossible as a science, but completely feasible as a philosophy....

(Ping received on Jun 17, 2008 at 6:09:18 AM EDT.)

The TrackBack URL for this entry is: http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/64096/29684624

The Soapbox
Your own bullhorn (approval required to counteract spammers)

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Meta

Validation: Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS

Licensing: Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution2.5 License, with exceptions.